To only read those who agree’s
A type of dystrophy:
Such arrogance, it always makes
For bad philosophy
Much specious reasoning is done
To open, empty air:
When having real debates,
The other side is always
There
To only read those who agree’s
A type of dystrophy:
Such arrogance, it always makes
For bad philosophy
Much specious reasoning is done
To open, empty air:
When having real debates,
The other side is always
There
Love it!
I feel that to “like” this may be falling into some kind of trap…
As long as you immediately “unlike” you should still be good.
I’ve learned a lot debating differing positions – most notably with my son. We’re still working over the “If a tree falls in the forest and nobody hears it…” question. I think he’s gaining the advantage as I age … Your choice of green for the hockey image is brilliant! I was born in Montreal (Canadiens – red). Dad was born in Toronto (Maple Leafs – blue). His team hasn’t won a Stanley Cup in 40 years. We don’t debate hockey much 🙂